CNN Removes "Do hormones drive women's votes?" Post
Earlier today, CNN posted an editorial which argued that women's hormones play a significant role in their voting decisions. Needless to say, it provoked strong reactions across the internet, mostly because it was pseudo-scientific horseshit. Here are some highlights:
While the campaigns eagerly pursue female voters, there's something that may raise the chances for both presidential candidates that's totally out of their control: women's ovulation cycles.
You read that right. New research suggest that hormones may influence female voting choices differently, depending on whether a woman is single or in a committed relationship.
The researchers found that during the fertile time of the month, when levels of the hormone estrogen are high, single women appeared more likely to vote for Obama and committed women appeared more likely to vote for Romney, by a margin of at least 20%, Durante said. This seems to be the driver behind the researchers' overall observation that single women were inclined toward Obama and committed women leaned toward Romney.
Here's how Durante explains this: When women are ovulating, they "feel sexier," and therefore lean more toward liberal attitudes on abortion and marriage equality. Married women have the same hormones firing, but tend to take the opposite viewpoint on these issues, she says.
"I think they're overcompensating for the increase of the hormones motivating them to have sex with other men," she said. It's a way of convincing themselves that they're not the type to give in to such sexual urges, she said.
It seems like 282 mostly angry comments and several scathing online responses brought CNN to its senses; a few hours ago, they removed the post, saying it didn't meet their standards.
A post previously published in this space regarding a study about how hormones may influence voting choices has been removed.
After further review it was determined that some elements of the story did not meet the editorial standards of CNN.
We thank you for your comments and feedback.
However, it should be noted that Erick Erickson is still on CNN's payroll.
[Image via CNN]